To many, this October 1 was just another day, but if the ICD-10 compliance date hadn't been moved last year, it wouldn't have been so. EHR Intelligence recently reflected on the relationship between most practices and ICD-10 at a time when it would have been originally required to comply. As of now, the clock is ticking for providers, who officially have less than a year to meet the demands of the policy.
Although the entire point of the delay was to give entities more time to comply, a survey from the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) shows that may not have been the case. Out of 514 respondents, 324 of which were providers, more than half have either not begun external testing yet or said that their status is "unknown."
In a summary statement from the organization on these results, the chair of WEDI, Jim Daley, said there needs to be more improvement in testing in order for organizations to be ready by next year.
"Unless all industry segments make a dedicated effort to continue to move forward with their implementation efforts, there will be significant disruption on Oct 1, 2015," he said. "Other factors that contribute to slow industry progress include competing internal priorities and other regulatory mandates, and in the latest survey readiness of other entities was also identified as an important factor."
There were more providers that responded to the survey this August than there have been in past versions of it. However, it's been two years since the number was more than 1,000, which the organization attributes to "enhanced outreach efforts."
Practices need to look for the healthcare consulting firms who will give them adequate support in testing and instigating a transition in time.